1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

T-86 direct replacement 4 or 5 speed?

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by Drjeepster, Jul 12, 2005.

  1. Jul 12, 2005
    Drjeepster

    Drjeepster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Hi there

    I have a 67 jeepster commando with aT86 3 speed transmission. Looking for a direct replacement 4 or 5 speed to hopefully increase fuel economy of my 225 odd fire. suggestions?
     
  2. Jul 12, 2005
    lafester

    lafester Sponsor

    loveland, co
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Messages:
    260
    your best bet would be to get an overdrive for the transfer case if you have a d18.
    any tranny swap will involve some modification and adapters. i would imagine that if you searched the forum for t86 or transmission you would find some good info on the topic.

    i am not very familiar with that tranny or the commando drivetrain so i may be mistaken.

    chris
     
  3. Jul 13, 2005
    jpflat2a

    jpflat2a what's that noise?

    Hermosa, SD
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    8,525
    4 speed might only get you a lower first gear as 4th gear will be 1:1 final drive
    same as T86 3 speed
    5 speed will get you an overdrive in 5th
    prob not an easy swap at all $$$
    I seem to recall a Saginaw 4speed that might be an easier swap,if you just have to have a 4 speed; the ratios aren't that great for wheeling though
    what do you plan to use your Jeepster for ?
    mostly highway use ?
    if your Jeepster is still stock, it will have a D20 t/case, which won't accept a Warn overdrive
     
  4. Jul 13, 2005
    lafester

    lafester Sponsor

    loveland, co
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Messages:
    260
    still would be easier to swap in a d18 and an offset rear axle then to try and get a 5 speed in there. i am assuming that the poster wants overdrive for mpg (that is a bolt-in direct swap), but perhaps not.

    perhaps the auto tranny that came stock on a lot of commandos would improve mpg? that may be the cheapest route available.
     
  5. Jul 13, 2005
    Jeepenstein

    Jeepenstein Me like Jeep.. 2024 Sponsor

    North Central FL
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    2,159
    the auto is still a 1:1 final and the pumping losses tend to actually decrease MPG.. besides who cares about fuel economy.. it's a 40 year old jeep.. if it's that much of an issue buy a $500 geo and get 40 MPG for less than any swap you could make..

    BUBBA
     
  6. Jul 13, 2005
    lafester

    lafester Sponsor

    loveland, co
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2002
    Messages:
    260
    i am sure it isn't that important to drjeepster either, he was probably just curious what trannys would bolt in and if any of them were better.

    basicly the answer appears to be none.

    chris
     
  7. Jul 13, 2005
    jpflat2a

    jpflat2a what's that noise?

    Hermosa, SD
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    8,525

    the swap mentioned above would prob be the easiest to do;
    then you could add an o'drive :D
     
  8. Jul 13, 2005
    kamel

    kamel Senior Curmudgeon

    Erlanger, Kentucky
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    891
    Now, I'm not a big fan of swapping stuff, but if you absolutely want a five speed, here is a way to do it.

    Get a CJ-7 drive line with the 6 cyl engine, trans(5sp), transfer case. If you swapped in that stuff you'd have what you are wanting.

    You could probably sell the v-6 (if it is any good at all) for a good part of the drive line cost. Keep the exhaust manifolds and exhaust pipes and sell them separately.

    Between the two you would be pretty far along cost-wise.

    I have been wanting to do that with an old cj5, but every time I get a good candidate for the swap I find I'd rather fix it than cut it up.
     
  9. Jul 13, 2005
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Putting an inline 6 into an early CJ or Jeepster Commando is not advisable, unless you want to move the firewall back. Too long.

    There's no easy way to get an overdirive gear without a lot of effort or expense. Probably the cheapest would be a Ford SROD (single rail overdrive) 4-speed from an 80s Granada or such. Not common, but available. Still requires a lot of effort to adapt to your existing engine and driveline.

    IMO a different transmission isn't going to affect your fuel mileage that much. Aerodynamics is the biggest problem, not gearing. Reducing your top speed by 10mph will help a lot. Fuel injection would also help, but that's not straightforward on an oddfire V6. If it were mine, I'd drive it and enjoy it for what it is, not what it's never going to be (ie an economy car).
     
  10. Jul 13, 2005
    kamel

    kamel Senior Curmudgeon

    Erlanger, Kentucky
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    891
    Re putting an inline 6 in a cj.

    Well, I am not a big fan of major swaps.

    That said, I don't think you would have to push the firewall backwards -- seems you could go also go forward. That's what jeep did.

    Now, if you did it with a pre'72 CJ you'd have a shorter distance from the grille to the front bumper, and might have to use 72 and newer fenders and hood, but I've seen the later model fenders/grille/hood installed on a mid 60's jeep, and while it looked a little strange at first, it wasn't really bad.

    I'm going to get a chance to do some measuring and side by side comparison in the next month or so.

    If you look at a postal jeep, for example, you can see that there isn't really that much more room required. Postals used the pre 72 fenders and hood and an oddball grille. It looked to be offset around 1 - 1 1/2 inches or so.

    It is unlikely that I'll ever try it, but it would be interesting to see one done.
     
  11. Jul 13, 2005
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    I'm not sure ... every early-CJ I6 conversion I've seen (Chevy 230, Ford 170, Studebaker) has had a big hole in firewall. I know that the small block Buick V8s (300, 340, 350cid) will fit in a CJ or Jeepster Commando if you cut back the grille to move the radiator forward. In general, I6s are 50% longer than V8s...

    I'd say the bubble grille from a postal is good evidence that you can't put an AMC I6 in an early CJ without cutting the firewall (at least without changing the fenders. grille and hood). The 72 and later CJs add a full 5" to the front sheet metal, in addition to moving the radiator closer to the grille. All this extra length was needed for the 232/258, not for the 304 (or so I've heard). I'd also expect that later fenders on an earlier frame would have severe tire interference problems - Intermediates already have interference problems because the frame was lengthened less than the sheet metal (3" v. 5"), and on an 81" frame, that interference would be even worse.

    Not trying to be argumentative here, but there are so many worthy I4s and V6s that fit easily into the early CJ engine compartment, that one would be punishing oneself needlessly by choosing to swap in an I6. Why hasn't anyone swapped a Dodge V6 with an NP435? Even many V8s (ie SBC, SBF, Buicks) would be vastly easier than swapping an I6 - unless, of course, you cut the firewall.
     
  12. Jul 13, 2005
    jd7

    jd7 Sponsor

    Nacogdoches,Texas
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,745
    Simple but expensive, Keep the V6 get a NV4500 with GM bolt pattern adapter to Dana 300. You end up with a low gear and overdrive but good luck finding an NV4500 inexpensively.
     
  13. Jul 14, 2005
    Drjeepster

    Drjeepster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Wow! Quite a few suggestions. Thanks. Planned use of the Jeepster? Hmm...Well I plan on painting it hot pink and cruising da hood, install a 'la cuccaracha' horn under the hood, drop it to the ground and put a chain steering wheel in place of the stock. NOT!!! :shock:

    Want to lift it enought to put 32s on her, take her pig hunting in Central California, use it as a the official Pack 84 vehicle and take it to car shows to raise awareness of the local scout pack and hopefully drum up support. Otherwise it'll be my daily driver. The reason I wanted to possibly swap out the trans was primarly to gain in economy. At least that was my hope.

    No automatic transmissions for this jeep, thank you. I'm sure auto transmissions are fine and work well, but for me it just isn't right.

    One reason for owning an older Jeep in the grand state of California is that it is way cheaper to register and insure on older vehicle in this state. taxes are based on original purchase prices..
     
  14. Jul 14, 2005
    Drjeepster

    Drjeepster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Also, I plan to keep the 225 in place as it is a strong running engine. I've read up on this thing and it was Buicks answer to the Dodge slant Six. If any one here know about the slant six you know it was near impossible to destroy, even if you ran it without oil. I know I tried it once. No it did not die, didn't even score the cylinders. Please do not ask me how that happened. From what I understand the 225 odd fire has the DNA of the Slant six and can last as long as one changes oil and spark plugs. I'm not willing to try the running it without oil stunt though..hey I was 18 then.
     
  15. Jul 14, 2005
    Drjeepster

    Drjeepster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    In answer to the jd7, thank you for the suggestion. So far I have found nothing inexepensive about this jeepster, nothing except maybe the jeep itself. Got it for 500.00 a the local American Legion. Some guy was in need of drinking money and hey, I was looking for a classic. I got a totally trashed transmission(literally in pieces), wasted transfer case, flat springs, one dead rat and a used condom...yuck. Frame was straight, engine fired up with a new battery and liquid mechanic. 20 minutes of smoke..solid runner. I love the lope of the odd fire. she sounds cool.
     
  16. Jul 14, 2005
    jd7

    jd7 Sponsor

    Nacogdoches,Texas
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,745
    $500 is a good starting place. Better than some that I've had. If you got a trashed trans and transfer case then I'd look into some of the swap suggestions. Check here for info also: www.novack-adapt.com and www.advanceadapters.com . Plenty of stuff there that can be done. Oh yeah I don't think there is any such thing as a cheep Jeep, at least I never had one. :rofl:
     
  17. Jul 14, 2005
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    What rear end gearing do you have? I'd expect that you have 3.83s, and probably won't gain much from an overdrive. Look for a tag under the cover bolts front or rear, or if those are gone, the tooth count is stamped into the ring gear.

    If you are interested in the SROD 4-speed, R&P sells an adpater and can tell you more. I'd be more inclined to replace a hammered T-86 with a T-14. The T-14 was used in later V6 CJs and Jeepsters, and has a synchro 1st gear. I understand you can also take the guts from a T-90 and put them into a T-86 case - probably the cheapest way out.

    I don't know about the slant six thing ... Buick engines are reputed to suffer from oiling problems when tired, especially if run dry ;) Certainly the early slant six that had the steel crank was nearly indestructible.
     
  18. Jul 16, 2005
    66cj5

    66cj5 Jeep with no name

    NorthWest Indiana
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,084
    The T-14A/dana18/od/offset rear end would be a good (and easy) swap.
     
  19. Jul 16, 2005
    rich45

    rich45 New Member

    atascadero,Califo...
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Messages:
    33
    Before I say anything else-welcome to the forum!I've got basicly the same model jeepster (1968) as you.As far as milage goes I'm thinking a HEI ignition and better flowing exhaust.I have the T86 with a dana 20 transfer so I'm looking at the GM 420 to replace the T86 some day when life slows down, the stars line up ect.....Advance Adapters is local if you are in the central coast (Paso Robles).Good luck.
     
  20. Jul 16, 2005
    jeepdaddy2000

    jeepdaddy2000 Active Member

    Eagle Point oregon
    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    1,187
    While I would agree with you, I've found the t14 trans to be weak at best. The fact that the origional drivetrain is toast gives you a few more options. The nice thing about the Commando is it's longer wheelbase, allowing a few more options thatn the CJ. The problem is that any adaption you decide on will require copious amounts of cash to lube the process. My suggestion is to plan out the repairs and gather to cash to do them right. Don't skimp on the trans. V6's pump out a lotta torque. An accedential cluch drop in a sticky spot can grenade an early 3 speed in the blink of an eye. While t150 can be adapted in, a four speed or better will last longer. With your criteria of an overdrive, You can look at the Ford trans mentioned above with an adapter or the NV4500. On a side note, a good running V6 with a direct drive trans, driven modestly, will net MPG's in the upper teens and low twenties. I drove my CJ cross country(before all the mods) and pulled 23MPG.
     
New Posts