1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

A Few Good Words

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by 1969 CJ-5, Dec 1, 2006.

  1. Dec 1, 2006
    1969 CJ-5

    1969 CJ-5 AZ Native

    Whiteman AFB Misouri
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    154
    I was cruising the JP website and saw an article about the top ten jeep motor swaps. Here is what they said about the 225.

    6. Buick 225 V-6 What: A 90-degree odd-fire torque monster found in early '60s GM cars and '66-'71 CJ-5 and CJ-6 Jeeps.

    Why: The 225 V-6 will idle down to 50 rpm, gets great mileage, delivers more than enough torque for an early Jeep, and is just plain fun to drive and listen to.

    Put it in: It's a factory fit in any CJ-5 or CJ-6 and drops right into a flattie. FCs and other oddball Jeeps can benefit as well.

    Parts sources: 4Wheel Drive Hardware, 800/555-3353, www.4wd.com; Advance Adapters, 800/350-2223, www.advanceadapters.com; GM Performance Parts, 800/883-4716, www.gmperformanceparts.com; Kenne Bell, 909/941-6646, www.kenne-bell.com.


    I am glad you guys talked me into keeping mine. Saw my motor at the machine shop last night on the boring stand, the machinest said it needed bored out so we are going 30 over. I am excited to get the pieces back and start the build up. This site is the best!
     
  2. Dec 1, 2006
    Andy4802

    Andy4802 Canadian Jeep junkie

    Hudson, Qc, Canada
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    410
    yeah i read that exact same article.. the thing that caught my attention is that it idles down to 50rpm... thats gotta be pretty cool to listen to.. Less than one rotation per second!!
     
  3. Dec 1, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    Link to article?
     
  4. Dec 1, 2006
    mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Charlottesville Va
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    I am thinking 50 is a bit of an exageration... but if it isn't then I want to hear that.
     
  5. Dec 1, 2006
    1969 CJ-5

    1969 CJ-5 AZ Native

    Whiteman AFB Misouri
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    154
  6. Dec 1, 2006
    william_cj3b

    william_cj3b 3BOB driver

    Milton, FL
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    421
    Maybe, mine will still pull down to 200 rpm after 300K on the clock.
     
  7. Dec 1, 2006
    mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Charlottesville Va
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    200 I believe. but 50?
     
  8. Dec 1, 2006
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    They're right about the Caddy 472/500 too. The rest seem kinda obvious or expensive or not really suited to Jeeps.
     
  9. Dec 1, 2006
    JustEnos

    JustEnos Member

    Fox Point, NS,...
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    292
    Hmmm, wonder if I can find a way to mount up the 225 in my XJ....
     
  10. Dec 1, 2006
    hudsonhawk

    hudsonhawk Well-Known Member

    North Texas...
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,944
    I have had my 258 down to about 300 RPM without killing it.
     
  11. Dec 1, 2006
    toolbox

    toolbox If you get bored, I've got the projects.

    Hamilton, Montana
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    347
    I used to have a '75 Sedan de Ville with the 500 in it. They're right about the torque...even in a car as huge as that, it would get up and move from a stop. I have a copy of a Hot Rod mag somewhere with an article about swapping one into an El Camino. Their big complaint was that they couldn't get traction, and spent a lot of time smoking tires :twisted: . When it did hook up it was pretty fast IIRC. There's not a whole lot out there for performance parts, but then you don't really need much with 500 cubes stock. If you want one cheap, just shop for the whole car...pretty cheap when you can find them.
     
  12. Dec 1, 2006
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    I built a couple Olds 455 before, put one in a 68 camaro:) :) :)

    Talk about cheap torque.
    Too big for my flattie. But in a longer wheelbase you could just build it stock.
    As I recall they are narrower than a CBB. Or caddie.
    Fit real well in my camaro I could lift the hood at 75mph
    I have a well built 454 600 horsepower 550 torque now, but just too big for my jeep.
     
  13. Dec 1, 2006
    neptco19

    neptco19 That guy....

    Athens, GA
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,381
    So you know one of there editors is a member here... Im sure they dont mean it will sit there and run constantly at 50 rpm. My thinking is you could bog it down to that for a brief second or two then rev it back up to a more normal rpm. Where most other engines will die when it reaches that point, this one will keep chuggin.
     
  14. Dec 2, 2006
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    :iagree: I did manage to get it to where I thought it had died the other day on one of the backroads here in the Flint Hills. It reved right back up and kept going. I'm fairly sure the TJ would've just died and I would've needed to restart it.
     
  15. Dec 2, 2006
    Executioner

    Executioner Member

    Reading,Pa, USA
    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    347
    Can these v6's be bolted into an Fhead set up with little aggrivation?
    Meaning will the drive train handle the xtra power and would I need to move the radiator? This Fhead is constantly giving me grief and the power is ALOT lower than what I'm used to (highway) I know I'd still be limited on rpm's but I'd atleast not have a fully loaded rig crawling up my but going up a small incline strugglin to maintain 50 mph:rofl:
     
  16. Dec 2, 2006
    trickpatrick

    trickpatrick Done? LOL

    North Idaho USA
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Messages:
    838
    My problem with the buick is finding one of those early flywheels.
    i have the motor but it is cheaper for me to just get the vortec v6 and use that flywheel.
    either motor will fit in our flatties fine actully shorter than stock with about double horse and torque.:)

    The buick has the distributer in front as well.
     
  17. Dec 2, 2006
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    How do you use the Buick 225 flywheel on a Chevy V6?
     
  18. Dec 2, 2006
    jayhawkclint

    jayhawkclint ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Oklahoma City, USA
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,622
    The way I read it, I think he meant using the Vortec flywheel on a Buick V6, but either way, I'd like to know, too.

    I don't know about accurate RPMs, but I've also had mine chugging down real low and been able to gun it and save it. In fact, I think my 2G is more of a limiting factor than the motor itself; the times I've had my RPMs that low also happens to be the times I'm on some kind of incline and the carb is tending to want to flood. My later model stuff tends to act erratic as soon as they dip below 500RPM.
     
  19. Dec 2, 2006
    MOP

    MOP Active Member

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,131
    The way I read it.. He is saying for some reason he can't find a 225 V6 flywheel, so it is cheaper to install a complete Vortec (with it's flywheel) instead of a 225 V6 (with it's flywheel).
     
  20. Dec 2, 2006
    tgregg

    tgregg Member

    Oak Hills, CA...
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    529
    Yes it sounded like he couldn't find a flywheel for the 225 which he had without a flywheel.
     
New Posts