1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Cj 5 Crate Motor

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by dnickels, Feb 28, 2006.

  1. dnickels

    dnickels New Member

    New to site "Great Read" tons of information.

    A bubby of mine ask me to do some research to find out what his crate motor was worth. He recently purchased a 1966 CJ5 "very clean" that included an extra short block still in the original crate. Unfortunately, circumstances caused him to sell the Jeep but he did not include the motor in the sale.

    The numbers on the block were 19J4 (does that mean 1974?) and on the bottom was 991503 (block casting 1967-1974)

    Any advise would be appreciated. Thanks
     
  2. tomcam

    tomcam Member

    4cyl or v6
     
  3. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

  4. dnickels

    dnickels New Member

    225 V6
     
  5. jmar1977

    jmar1977 New Member

    I might be interested in that motor if he wants to sell it .
     
  6. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    I know. Did you check the areas where the block numbers are indicated on the page linked too?
     
  7. dnickels

    dnickels New Member

    Yes, he selling it but first he has to figure out a value.

    I checked the block numbers and found that 991503 = 67-74 225 V6, but I am trying to narrow that down. The number I can't figure out is the 19J4 on the top front of the block.
     
  8. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    I was asking about the engine numbers on the side...

    I know you found the casting number. I know those when I see 'em.

    The engine numbers aren't on top in front. I was asking if you had looked in the location that's indicated on the page I linked too?
     
  9. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    [​IMG]

    From that page:
     
  10. dnickels

    dnickels New Member

    Sorry, I misunderstood your question. I will look at that tonight

    Thanks for your help.
     
  11. Hippo393

    Hippo393 Jeepless

  12. termin8ed

    termin8ed I didn't do it Staff Member

    hmm. bad link Alan. I think I have the cyber buick police onto me know:D
     
  13. dnickels

    dnickels New Member

    I tried that link to OOPS. Thanks for the effort Hippo393

    Just to clear the air Vanguard. I didn't ask the question to cause any problems. It's not my motor, I'm not trying to sell it to any of you, and if someone feels the need to ban me from this site for what I thought was a legitimate question, you have the power to do that. My thinking was this is an original short block in it's original crate from the late 60's. I thought there might be more value with this motor than going to a junk yard and rebuilding a 35 year old V6 from a rusted out Buick.

    Sorry if I ruffled any feathers here. After reviewing the site and seeing the passion the member have for their Jeeps, I anticipated a different response.
     
  14. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    We had a bad experience with someone with a crate motor here a while back. It's not what you've done persay but what someone else did before you.
     
  15. Hippo393

    Hippo393 Jeepless

    :?
    Me thinks sum-body went in and messed w/ the pic. ;)

    Lessee if this 'un works:
     
  16. timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Methinks that Buick site has a demon that polices linking from other sites. I got the same result when I tried to link to them to show the bellhousing mounting on a nailhead many moons ago. Somehow they move the links around to substitute that snotty (IMO) message. Such linkage would be allowed under the fair use doctrine IMO.
     
  17. sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    That is snotty, if you're linking directly to their page.

    I thought I "fixed" it since it wasn't displaying an image. Bandwidth issues I understand. But that is excessive accusing me of being a pirating site and that they have "recorded" the information. Sheesh.