1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Let's Nerd Out On Some Calculations

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by FinoCJ, Apr 20, 2024.

  1. May 2, 2024
    Fireball

    Fireball Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,771
    I personally haven't done enough rock crawling to even know what crawl ratio I need. The 70:1 in the TJ seemed pretty nice in Moab but I didn't do any of the serious obstacles.

    So many people have 100:1 plus crawl ratios. Is that really necessary?

    Is it worth the extra $1000.00 for Tera lows to take my flatfender from 83:1 to 107:1? It seems like 83:1 would be fine for 98% of the stuff out there. (Buick V6 and 35 inch tires in mind)
     
  2. May 2, 2024
    timsresort

    timsresort Active Member 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    South Lake Tahoe CA
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    1,421
    I went for years with 90:1. Pretty good Rubicon gear with 33's. Your 83 with 35's would be the minimum in my book, but it would be fine after you air down. The reason I did the 3.15's was to get a decent 2nd. My old 2L was in the 40's-too fast for the easy section when you want to shift. The new 2nd is in the 60's, and is perfect for cruising on the in between obstacles trail. Then I have my old 90 (1st over), or 119 (1 low) for the little sluice.
    So to answer your question, no it's not necessary, it's just a little better. And it can always be added later.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2024
    Fireball likes this.
  3. May 2, 2024
    Rich M.

    Rich M. Shoe salesman 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Maryland
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,227
    I'm at 83 and have yet to want for more.
     
    timsresort and Fireball like this.
  4. May 2, 2024
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,714
    I dream of getting the cj5 to 60....I don't run little sluice though
     
  5. May 2, 2024
    Jw60

    Jw60 That guy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Sedalia MO.
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,888
    Last edited: May 2, 2024
    Fireball likes this.
  6. May 2, 2024
    Fireball

    Fireball Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,771
    Jw60 likes this.
  7. May 2, 2024
    Jw60

    Jw60 That guy 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Sedalia MO.
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,888
    Soooooooo.... we forgot the rancho overdrive.
    Gonna need another column to add that and the 203 shifter... and a ranger overdrive.
     
  8. May 3, 2024
    Fireball

    Fireball Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,771
    I added a NP203 1.96:1 doubler, and Strongbox D300 2.72:1 doubler.

    Even though I have a Rancho overdrive kicking around, I'm not adding it since it's 2wd only and too long. Plus it means a whole 'nother column I don't want to add.
     
    Jw60 likes this.
  9. May 3, 2024
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,714
    It's not so much about dreaming, but rather identifying exactly what one wants to build based on use and budget etc.....there are so many cool builds out there, but I can't build them all....so what is right in theory for me, then find the best available rig that provides the platform. Recently I was looking at an intermediate cj6 with AMC V8 304 and stock drivetrain. At first I was really excited about it - I accept it will need the crawl improved with a T18 and low gears. I thought the 4.27 axles were a benefit, and was considering paying premium price for the rig, but after this I think I would end up regearing the axles for more highway friendly, so on top of the trans and TC work factor in two axle regears ...all of a sudden the premium price for this rig isn't really worth it. Better off with a builder rig for budget start and find 3.54 or 3.73 axles. And while I like the D18 in both the 7O and 58 for OD usage, time for something direct drive TC....so maybe this helps set targets that allow us to figure out our dreams at an acceptable budget..
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2024
    Jw60 and Fireball like this.
  10. May 3, 2024
    Fireball

    Fireball Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,771
    An NV4500 and a standard 2.62 D300 would give you a 70:1 crawl with 4.27s and effective 3.2 highway gear. And.... 108:1 crawl with LoMax gears in the D300.

    Just sayin.
     
  11. May 3, 2024
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,714
    That vintage intermediate cj6 came with D20, so the D300 route adds expense, and Ive never seen an nv4500 that I could afford either. Add that on top of a premium purchase price, and it really is a dream. As tim said, T18s and 18/20 low gears are reasonably cheap....nv4500 with 3.15 low gears would do well with 4.27s....the nv4500 is aptly named as the seem to cost $4500
     
  12. May 3, 2024
    Fireball

    Fireball Well-Known Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Pullman, WA
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2018
    Messages:
    5,771
    Well then you can get similar results with a brand new Tr4050 for only $3300. Even comes with an aluminum case to save some weight! Not really adaptable to a D20 though. Bolts right to a 300.

    https://www.shiftsst.com/tremec-tr-4050/p27
     
    colojeepguy and Ol Fogie like this.
  13. May 3, 2024
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,714
    Quite the question....Even with all this math, it's still hard to understand what it will feel like if you've never driven a rig with ballpark CRs! As one that has typically wheeled a rig with too little CR with a v6 that isn't a low rpm torque monster, I think 83 is plenty good for 35s. But again, what do I know. My experience tells me that chunky boulder strewn trails like the Rubicon, and some stuff in Colo, like more CR, whereas the slickrock trails in Moab can run a bit less CR due to the steep climbs and short wheelbase. Maybe a long wheelbase rig in Moab could get away with a bit more crawl and walk up the big ledges the little CJs need to 'hump and bump' as rich says. To some extent, I think the small tire swb rigs need more bumping and throttle goose-ing than lwb big tire rigs that sort of walk over everything. Watching Tom drive a fhead on 31s through the Rubicon shows throttle driving! If I can get the CJ on 33s to a CR of 60 and love it, I think these calculations show a lwb rig on 35s with CR of 80 and low rpm torque is even more functional. We need to drive each other rigs a bit....you can drive mine and know what too little CR feels like! I've ridden in a couple other of our members rigs in Colo and other trips....riding in Rich's FF has indicated I don't need more crawl than that. Riding in Jim's yj with 35s and CR in the 60s suggests that actually is usable, but he also has fuel injected 4.0 that runs at 400 rpm when needed, so his ground speed is actually pretty slow for that typical CR. I've never ridden in a rig with CR of 90 or more so maybe I don't know what I am missing. With manual steering I probably couldn't turn it moving that slow!
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2024
    Jw60 and Fireball like this.
New Posts