1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Machined Sm465 Bearing Retainer?

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by Bigdaddy13, Dec 14, 2020.

  1. Dec 14, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    I thought I heard mention of an SM465 bearing retainer that had been taken down to 4 11/16th's?

    Novak or Advanced adapters?

    I see one for a T18, but not for the GM transmission to buick. is it because they want to sell their Buick 225 V6 bellhousing with 5.25ish diameter machined into it?

    Anyone have a link or maybe clarifying info?

    (BTW, I'm not asking related to BOP bellhousings. that's been covered ad nauseum on this forum. I'm looking into using the existing Fireball 198 that's in my rig. )
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
  2. Dec 14, 2020
    garage gnome

    garage gnome ECJ5 welder

    Western MA
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    3,093
    An SM465 will bolt right up to the buick bell housing. Both are GM components.
     
  3. Dec 14, 2020
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    from Novak:
    As the reader will conclude, the Chevrolet and General Motors SM465 will marry directly to a GM style bellhousing. This includes Chevy car, Buick, Oldsmobile and Pontiac bellhousings. However, since this transmission has such a large bearing retainer, the car size bellhousing bore is smaller than the transmission's input bearing retainer. If you need to join this transmission to a GM bellhousing with the 4-11/16” bore, it can be done. The bore must be opened up to 5.000” and the retainer turned down to 4.995” as precision slip-fit. We can perform this service with a very quick turnaround, or you may have it done by a good machine shop local to you. We also sell new bearing retainers turned to the dimension you require.
     
  4. Dec 14, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    yup, I couldn't find on their site where those are listed. Maybe I just need to call?
     
  5. Dec 14, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    Alas, my research tell me that the SM465 requires a larger opening for a larger bearing retainer, than say, the SM420. I'm still hemming and hawing about which transmission I'd like to use. Pro's and con's to each, but one of the issues I have to deal with on the SM465 is either opening up my bellhousing to 5" +/-, or turning down the bearing retainer (or locating one that's been turned down to swap in)
     
  6. Dec 14, 2020
    Mcruff

    Mcruff Earlycj5 Machinist

    Albertville, AL
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    5,349
    I don't think you can physically take the bearing retainer down to fit the standard bell housing 4-11/16" you have to bore the bell housing out 5" as the 4.995 is the smallest you can safely turn the bearing retainer down to.
     
    Bigdaddy13 and FinoCJ like this.
  7. Dec 14, 2020
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    I think Mike is correct from my research and discussion with Novak on this. You can turn down the sm465 retainer to 4.995, but you can't turn it all the way down to 4 11/16". I am not sure how far down you can safely machine the retainer....certainly its worth a call to Novak to confirm.....I am working with a sbc350, but found it easier to get a bellhousing with correct 5 1/8" bore than worry about trying to get stuff machined....not sure you have as much options with buick mating.
     
    Bigdaddy13 likes this.
  8. Dec 14, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    Ahh, thanks for the clarification.

    i have a bellhousing with the correct opening for an sm465. That’ll work just fine bolted to my 4.3l. Only problem is that i’m seeking to find out if i can use my 198, for the time being, since that is a much easier trans/tcase swap.

    can anyone confirm that the sm420 bearing retainer is the smaller size?
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
  9. Dec 14, 2020
    Jay's WWII Jeeps

    Jay's WWII Jeeps Member

    Napa CA
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    172
  10. Dec 14, 2020
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    Yes the 420 will fit on a BOP bellhousing...that has been my plan for the cj5 with 225v6. The 420 is like the early 465s and had the open bottom bell such that the two bottom mounting bolts go 'inside-out'....when using with the fully enclosed BOP bell you might have work around that just a bit....
     
  11. Dec 15, 2020
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    No. The case bolt pattern works but the front bearing retainer is too large due to the large input bearing diameter.
     
  12. Dec 15, 2020
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,529
    Been covered here before but if you want to use a BOP bellhousing most people machine the front bearing retainer of the transmission and the bird of the bellhousing to use an SM 465 transmission. If going to an earlier Chevrolet V-8 or V-6 then the bellhousing that came with the SM-465 works fine.
     
  13. Dec 15, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    Not covered much, actually. I have a 198 not a 225. it's not the standard "valley" BOP bellhousing, but I'm getting very confident that it has the same 4 11/16 index opening and GM pattern on the back.

    What I'm hearing though, is that it's my Fireball Bell that would need to be machined to fit the bigger 465 bearing retainer, which is good to throw in the idea hopper.

    Again, this is if I decide to run the 198, which I'd like to. I'm not intimidated by the 4.3l swap, it's just SO much more downtime, compared to pulling the T90/D18 and installing the Trans/Tcase.

    I really like both the 420 and the 465 for different reasons - just mulling my options. Both would go to a big hole D18 because I want to retain the option of an overdrive.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
  14. Dec 15, 2020
    cayenne

    cayenne Member

    central Texas
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2006
    Messages:
    277
    I had my 225 bellhousing machined to fit the sm465 bearing retainer by a local machine shop. It wasn't too big of a deal, but it was a long time ago. I think I also had to clearance some holes or use socket head bolts due to some reinforcing ribs that were in the way of the mounting bolt (maybe i had them machine those too???) It was before I kept notes...but I do remember it not being as 'plug and play' as I remember.

    Edit: now that I think about it, I took both the retainer and the bellhousing to the machine shop so they didn't have to rely on my measurements.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
  15. Dec 15, 2020
    Bigdaddy13

    Bigdaddy13 Member

    So.Cal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2019
    Messages:
    556
    That’s a solid plan if i’m going to run a SM465, think.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
  16. Dec 15, 2020
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,470
    Can confirm that when I did mine I took it to a machine shop and had the retainer turned down and bell opened up - per Novak's instructions.
     
    Bigdaddy13 likes this.
New Posts