I don't really know how these prices stack up, but I asked the local shop for quotes on some Spicer pieces after I noticed their thread promoting...
I'm confused by this part. It seems that everyone agrees there are two sizes of joints.
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft I was thinking it didn't make sense because of what you just said - it isn't going anywhere. Even if some...
I already posted why I think they were used at the end of post #13. Nobody answered the question about when the small joints disappeared, so I am...
I think it wasn't mentioned because you don't need a smaller yoke to do those things. Refer to the later CJ front driveshafts of the "rod" design...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft Not in the driveshaft's shaft area you can't, but the transfer case front output yoke is the same size as the...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft I agree. Those were the next pictures I was chasing in the reply I was composing since FSJ's also used the...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft Yeah, I understand that. I don't think you guys get where the clearance concern lies. The yoke area is not...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft We have it covered, man. If you check the timestamps, this all took place today. I said I'd measure it and I...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft Well, its definitely not a 1310. That rules out the 297X/760. Just for nomenclature clarification, CJ's...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft I did think about it. That point is not where the yokes are located. The rear yoke is about halfway up the...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft That has a whole lot of nothing to do with the size of the u-joints or yokes. Think about it. Posted via Mobile...
Re: 1966 CJ-5 front driveshaft That's rather odd that the larger motor would use smaller joints. Edit: U-joint data now posted.
That's not the D20 you're getting, lol. You said you only wanted a housing.
I guess what I'm wanting to know is where it came from. Is this a unit you could get from the dealer, or is it an aftermarket piece. If...
Separate names with a comma.
