1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

My 67 CJ5A

Discussion in 'Builds and Fabricators Forum' started by fletcher0780, Jun 27, 2009.

  1. Sep 27, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    2psi will bring my effective compression to 10.06:1, and will add very little power. 7psi will bring my effective compression to 13.13:1, rather high, but workable with the correct ignition retard and proper fuel mixture. Below are a few maps at different boost levels, I know these are exact, but they give a general idea:

    0 psi (simulating stock):

    [​IMG]

    2 psi (notice I'm out of the sweet spot for this particular turbo):

    [​IMG]

    7 psi (looks very torquey and right where it needs to be in the turbo map):

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Sep 27, 2011
    willys59cj5

    willys59cj5 Sponsor

    Gilroy, CA
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    660
    Looks like you have it all worked out. Good luck with your project.
     
  3. Sep 27, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    Thanks for your input, I'm open to suggestions. I may look in to an MLS style headgasket to lower the compression a bit. will 231 gaskets work? How about 300 v8 gaskets cut down? That turbo looks like it would be happier around 15psi, but that won't happen without forged components. not to mention I don't want to replace my entire drivetrain.
     
  4. Sep 28, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    Found a source for MLS headgaskets in varying thicknesses. I should be able to get away with a decent amount of boost going this route:

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Sep 28, 2011
    willys59cj5

    willys59cj5 Sponsor

    Gilroy, CA
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    660
    If I were building a turbo motor, I would try and get close to the ratio in the turbocharged buick grand national which was 8:1.
     
  6. Sep 28, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    That was 8:1 static, add in the stock 10psi of boost and effective is about 13.5:1. Granted the GN engine had forged internals and piston squiters.
     
  7. Oct 9, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    I got my ECU (megasquirt 2), coil pack & driver (Audi v6), trigger wheel and pickup (ford edis 36-1 wheel), GM 4.3 TBI, GM 2 bar MAP sensor, and my K04 mazdaspeed turbo. I still need a 3.8 drivers side exhaust manifold to mount on the passenger side so I can start plumbing the turbo in. I'm going to try using one of those cold air intake systems for a TBI truck as my charge pipe (hopefully it can handle 7-8psi).
     
  8. Oct 10, 2011
    Farmer Mike

    Farmer Mike Member

    Butte City, Ca
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Interesting.... I'm just starting a 67 CJ5 turbo project. Its an 84 Grand National motor.
     
  9. Oct 11, 2011
    fletcher0780

    fletcher0780 Member

    Connecticut
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    147
    You'll be miles ahead of me using a gn motor as a starting point, but I can't see starting all over when my engine has less than 1000 miles. I should be able to sell off my HEI distributor and edelbrock 1403 carb pretty easy too. I've seen GN engines pushing over 30psi with no issues, will need to beef up your drivetrain for sure though.
     
  10. Oct 11, 2011
    Farmer Mike

    Farmer Mike Member

    Butte City, Ca
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Well I don't plan on changing the performance to much. I'm gonna leave it alone for now.
     
New Posts