1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Smaller tires = better braking?

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by ThePhantom, Aug 25, 2013.

  1. Aug 25, 2013
    ThePhantom

    ThePhantom Member

    Boston, MA
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    84
    I've competed the brake rebuild on my 69 CJ5 (10 in drums), and as expected, they work, but are only so-so for stopping. I'm trying to keep it as original as possible, so looking into downsizing the tires from 30x9.5x15 to either 235 or 225/75R15. My neighbor, a Chevy Blazer guy, says the smaller tires will improve the braking. He also said a less aggressive tread will help.

    Has anybody heard this before? I'm not sure I understand the physics if this is true.

    Thanks
     
  2. Aug 25, 2013
    mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Charlottesville Va
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    The physics don't lie smaller tires are going to have less angular momentum and thus will brake better. Lighter tires also help.
     
  3. Aug 25, 2013
    Rralphs

    Rralphs Old Member

    Nederland, Co
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    270
    Smaller tires give the brakes more mechanical advantage but smaller tires turn at a faster speed so more friction so might over heat easier.

    So from a user experience there will be less pedal pressure for the same rate of deceleration.
     
  4. Aug 25, 2013
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,208
    I agree that a smaller lighter tire will stop easier, but I don't see how tread design would factor in.
    If anything, an aggressive tread has more rolling resistance.
     
  5. Aug 25, 2013
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    The only way tread design would matter is wrt coefficient of friction. Usually an aggressive tread means less rubber in contact with the road (more and wider grooving), and the tire would be more likely to skid rather than stop the car. Rubber compound matters too. I suppose you could design a tire with a soft compound that would be less likely to skid than some conventional tires with a harder compound... so it's not an absolute rule.
     
  6. Aug 25, 2013
    Southtowns27

    Southtowns27 Custom Title

    The Backhills of...
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    536
    10" brakes should stop a stock CJ5 reasonably well. I drove mine with a smallblock Chevy in it, 33's, and the stock 9 inchers on all 4 corners for quite awhile and that worked..It gave my right leg a workout, but I could lock the 33s. I have 11" all the way around now and it makes a huge difference, but maybe you have some other underlying brake problem you haven't discovered yet? Manual drum brakes will never feel like modern power-assisted discs, but they should work just fine...
     
  7. Aug 25, 2013
    68BuickV6

    68BuickV6 Well-Known Member

    Hesperia, CA.
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    2,160
    Just use 11 inch drums. 10's are pointless.
     
  8. Aug 25, 2013
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,530
    More aggressive treaded tires are typically much heavier. Compare the weight of a mud and snow tire vs. an aggressive mud terrain tire.
    A larger diameter tire has more leverage to stop and typically more rotating mass. Therefore a larger tire is harder to stop rotationally than a smaller tire.


    Sent from my iPhone
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2013
  9. Aug 25, 2013
    piffey263

    piffey263 Active Member

    Medford, OR
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,214
    I was able to get my jeep lock up tires with 31 on 10 inch drums when I had everything adjusted right, but have sense switched to self adjusting 11 inch brakes its so much easier to get parts and they are self adjusting.

    this next one is anecdotal evidence, I am not sure if it applies to jeeps sense they are a lot lighter then a 1965 C30 chevy truck with flatbed.
    the previous owner switched to smaller tires P225/75r16, I would lock up those tires so fast at every stop light that it normally ended up me skidding about 14 feet. (in straight line.) It was a nice and easy pedal to press but with those stoplights and stopping at 65 mph to dead stop not for me.

    the tires were not able to take the weight of the truck so I found a set of stockers which was equivalent to a set of 31-33 inches, it was old school sizing. (8.5x16.5?)
    it took a lot more force to lock up the tires however I was able to stop better. No more skidding and watching the peoples face look scared when they heard my tires.
    I think it was probably a balance of tire size and size of your brakes with weight factored in.
     
  10. Aug 25, 2013
    billlucas

    billlucas New Member

    Ferndale, MI
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    21
    "Original as possible" means going down to 205/75/15. That's the closest metric equivalent to the 7.65 x 15s originally (likely) on it.
     
  11. Aug 25, 2013
    Rollbar

    Rollbar Minister

    Florida
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    404
    So is there a write up to switch to 11" or is it a bolt on etc. from later years?
     
  12. Aug 25, 2013
    nickmil

    nickmil In mothballs.

    Happy Valley, OR
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    12,530
    Try the search function. This has been covered ad nauseum


    Sent from my iPhone
     
  13. Aug 26, 2013
    termin8ed

    termin8ed I didn't do it Staff Member

    Mason, MI
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    4,424
    10" brakes are self adjusting and I didn't have any problems with them when I had them. I had 30" tires also.

    I came across some 11" backing plates cheap and since I had to replace the brakes anyways I changed the fronts. Still have the 10" in the rear.

    Biggest problem with the 10" stock brakes is they have the lug studs peened onto the drum so you pretty much have to destroy the drum getting it off. Need to replace the studs also.
     
  14. Aug 26, 2013
    ThePhantom

    ThePhantom Member

    Boston, MA
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    84
    Or just remove the drum and bearing as one. That's how I did it when I replaced the brake cylinders.
     
  15. Aug 27, 2013
    Rollbar

    Rollbar Minister

    Florida
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    404
    So to check the 10" wheel cylinders on the '65 I just can't pull the drum ?
     
  16. Aug 27, 2013
    termin8ed

    termin8ed I didn't do it Staff Member

    Mason, MI
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    4,424
    That works fine unless you need to replace rusty drums;)
     
  17. Aug 29, 2013
    ThePhantom

    ThePhantom Member

    Boston, MA
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    84
    I wish we could, but no. Need a big socket for the front and a puller for the rear. Sorry.
     
  18. Aug 29, 2013
    jasonjp62

    jasonjp62 Member

    Pennsboro WV.
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Messages:
    799
New Posts