1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Ford 2.3 and mazda 5-speed from a ranger...

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by waynaferd, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    I found an adapter to use the T-90 with the 2.3, but I'm wondering if there's a simple way to fit the 5-speed in there, too. I haven't had any luck finding adapters or info for attaching the t-case to it, however.

    Its for a 55 cj5, which I had originally planned on a stretch and 318/727....my how things have changed, LOL.....

    The 2.3 is fuel injected from a 96, BTW.....

    Any ideas? I'm thinking 5 close ratio gears (comparitively) would really bring some pizzaz.

    Thanks!!
     
  2. mb82

    mb82 I feel great!

    Problem with a 5 speed is they are too long to leave much if any rear driveshaft.
     
  3. alex211

    alex211 Member

    You'll have to bolt the transfer case to the rear end and use pivoting mounts for the engine.
     
  4. Patrick

    Patrick Super Moderator Staff Member

    Huh?

    Yes, too long, and those Mazda 5 speeds were not great transmissions.
     
  5. waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    Alrighty, I haven't looked at one but figured they were short stubby things....The T-90 it is I guess!

    Thanks!!
     
  6. colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    The 2.3 used to be a common swap, especially in flatfenders. It's a good engine that will give you a decent power boost and a lot more RPM capability without overpowering the stock drivetrain.
     
  7. AKCJ

    AKCJ Active Member

    I had an 87 ranger with the 2.3 and an older courier with the 2.3. It's a great motor.

    That 5-speed isn't so great.
     
  8. waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    This is from a 96 my father has that I used quite a bit....the frame rotted out and I rear ended a van, so it can't pass inspection and not really worth fixing.

    But it went pretty good, is rated at 105hp and 135ft.lbs, is FI and distributorless, so would make for a nice, nice driveable upgrade.

    Thanks!
     
  9. repeater

    repeater I'll break it.

    2.3 is a fantastic motor.....I'd grab one out of a turbo coupe though....now THAT would be fun....plenty of room to throw a small intercooler up front...just find an older one with a Garrett turbo rather than the intercooled IHI's turbo motors from 87/88...you can always add and plumb your own intercooler...and IHI turbos self-destruct when you push them over 14PSI...or if you already have the motor...you can probably make a franken-2.3 with an 84-85 head, exhaust manifold and turbo, and pull the ECU and wiring from the donor car. OK...I'm living my own imaginary project through your post...I'll shut up now.
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2011
  10. Long&Low

    Long&Low Active Member

    You have to manage upgrades and the retention of stock parts wisely. It is easy to desire the whiz-bang hi-zoot stuff. I say do the engine swap and keep the T90 tranny, factory transfer case.

    More importantly, post the work in the Project section so we can see how you did it.
     
  11. waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    If I can get it there.....so far I need a $300 adapter....AFTER I find a $200-$300 (on ebay) bellhousing!

    I figured the Mazda 5 speed had a removeable bellhousing....wrong!

    I gotta call the local scrapyards to see what I can find, but past experiences are telling me it won't be good :D

    But novak has a really nice write up on the swap..... http://www.novak-adapt.com/knowledge/pinto.htm
     
  12. alex211

    alex211 Member

    It was a joke. jeep toss
     
  13. waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    One of the local scrappers has a few mustang 2.3 bellhousings from 87 to a 91, for only $35.00!! Woot woot!!

    'Cept I don't know if those are the correct ones for the Novak kit. I'll hafta get some pictures so I can compare to the one on their website, since I don't know WTF I'm looking at when I google 2.3 mustang bellhousing images :D
     
  14. cerial

    cerial Banned

    Using a 2.3 turbo motor as a base engine without a turbo is a great place to start if you replace the engine . The turbo motors have cast pistons and other internals that will greatly help if you decide to lower the power curve. You really can't push a na motor with a bolt on turbo past 5 or so psi without hurting the "stock" internals.