1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Front Brake Overhaul & Now Hub Rebuild Too

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by Focker, Aug 28, 2015.

  1. Sep 1, 2015
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,894
    Yeah.

    I'd ignore the Wagoneer wheel cylinder sizes, since the weight distribution of a Wagoneer is totally different from a CJ.

    Look at the cylinder diameters for a '72 CJ-5 with 11"x2" Bendix brakes. These are 1.125" diam front cylinders. The force on the brakes is proportional to the piston area. A 1" piston has 79.01% of the area of a 1.125" diam piston, so the braking force for a 1" cylinder will be down by about 20% from a 1.125" cylinder. The rears on a '72 CJ are 15/16" diam. This is now 69.03% of the front, or down by 30%.

    If you use the 11" brakes on the front and the 10" on the rear, both are the same width so the 10s have about 10/11 or 91% of the shoe area off the 11s. We can assume that the '72 CJ force ratio 10:7 is ideal and make a BOTEC (back of the envelope calculation) aka WAG about what size the rear cylinders need to be.

    Using a 1" front cylinder, you want the area of the rear cylinder to be smaller then the front by 30%, then boosted by 11/10. So 0.6903 * 11 / 10 = 0.7593. I would make a spread sheet of the difference in areas front to rear from the different wheel cylinder sizes, in steps of 1/16".

    Area = (diam/2)^2 * pi. With 1" front and 13/16" rear, (13/32)^2 * pi / 0.5^2 * pi = (13/16)^2 = 0.6602 or 66%. If you use the 1" on the front, 7/8" rear is the closest to the ideal WAG at 0.7656 or 76%.

    What is the cylinder diameter of the 10" fronts now?

    I'd err on the side of larger cylinders on the rear, and then throttle them down using an aftermarket proportioning valve inline with the rear brakes if you have any rear lock-up.
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2015
  2. Sep 1, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    :shock:
    1"
     
  3. Sep 1, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    Yeah...I'm here. :)
     
  4. Sep 1, 2015
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,894
    The area of a circle is the radius (half the diameter) squared times pi. When you take the ratio of two circles, everything but the diameters squared cancels. So the ratio of diameter 1 to diameter 2 is (diameter 1 divided by diameter 2) times (diameter 1 divided by diameter 2).

    If it were doing this, I'd buy the 1.125" Jeep CJ front cylinders and install them in my backing plates. I'd buy 1" rubber kits and try to rebuild the 1" cylinders from the 10s. 13/16" cylinders are going to be too small. If there are no big pits in the 1" cylinders, hone them and they will probably be ok. The 1" cylinders will be too strong for the rears (87% of the fronts), but oh well. Then get a Wilwood proportioning valve and put it in the line to the rear brakes. This will help to hold off the rears in severe braking.

    http://www.wilwood.com/MasterCylinders/MasterCylinderValves.aspx
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2015
  5. Sep 2, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    Just bought a hone and rebuild kits...We'll see how they do.

    Edit - I decided to take the new wheel cylinders (I had already bought months ago when planning on putting the 11" drums in the rear) apart and use the guts for the rebuild of the 10" wheel cylinders. Might as well save a few bucks...They're no good to me otherwise.

    Rebuilt wheel cylinder.
    [​IMG]
     
  6. Sep 2, 2015
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,508
    :D - Tim, I don't think Focker realized a guy with an MIT background was going to answer him... nor prepared for the math it takes for some folks to make an 'educated guess'... but then most scientist types like you, or analytic types like me are strange to most folks.
     
  7. Sep 3, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    Tim...

    The circumference of your help times the radius of your advice divided by the parameter of your knowledge is equal to the sum of insurmountable technical support.

    In other words the 1.125" wheel cylinders are on the way.

    Thanks!
     
  8. Sep 3, 2015
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,807
    :rofl:
    r)r)
     
  9. Sep 3, 2015
    chris423

    chris423 Sponsor

    greeneville tn
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    564
    I agree with fockers equation !!?
     
  10. Sep 3, 2015
    Walt Couch

    Walt Couch 07/02/40 - 10/27/24 RIP

    cordele, Ga.
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    5,949
    There is a specialized group of guys on this forum of which Tim is a part of. This forum probably would not have survived without them. Keep up the good work.
     
  11. Sep 3, 2015
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,807
    I fully agree with this true statement.
     
  12. Sep 3, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    I ordered new wheel cylinders from RockAuto and totally spaced getting new shoes. Now I have to pay for another round of shipping and be delayed a few more days.

    Stoopid Focker.

    I'll search around town but the cost will probably be X2 or greater!
     
  13. Sep 3, 2015
    WorkInProgress

    WorkInProgress Member

    Kennewick, Wa
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    972
    Does that tech support speak english enough to understand?
     
  14. Sep 4, 2015
    WorkInProgress

    WorkInProgress Member

    Kennewick, Wa
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    972
    I don't know how much you were paying online for shoes but napa looks like it's only 17 dollars
     
  15. Sep 4, 2015
    WorkInProgress

    WorkInProgress Member

    Kennewick, Wa
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    972
    And it looks like Oreillys is 19.99 for 10 inch by 2 inch cj5 shoes
     
  16. Sep 4, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    RockAuto was surprisingly more and Napa wanted $24 ship to store or $17.10 ship to my house.

    $19.99 overnighted... I'll pick them up in the morning!

    Thanks for the jumbo socket, I'll get it back to you soon.
     
  17. Sep 4, 2015
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,807
    I like rock auto, but they are not always the cheapest. I use their site to get part numbers and brands and search those. sometimes amazon is substantially less with free shipping on the same exact part.
     
  18. Sep 4, 2015
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,894
    I found that the cheapest source of parts is generally ... Amazon.com or eBay. Amazon is especially good if you have Amazon Prime.
     
  19. Sep 4, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    Wheel cylinders from RockAuto.
    Shoes from O'Reilly.
    Knuckle seals from Amazon.

    Amazon Prime member!
     
  20. Sep 4, 2015
    Focker

    Focker That's a terrible idea...What time? Staff Member

    WA
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    7,541
    I know I'll get blasted for admitting this but I have to share so others won't risk it.

    I bought my CJ a year ago...The brakes were good...I didn't do anything to them. I know it's always recommended here to go through the brakes as one of the inspection points...I blew it off! While taking apart the front brakes today I found this.

    Here are my "good" brakes.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
New Posts