1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Doors! its the law!

Discussion in 'Intermediate CJ-5/6/7/8' started by Sparky74cj, Jun 18, 2010.

  1. Jun 18, 2010
    Sparky74cj

    Sparky74cj Member

    Naches, Washington
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    146
    Does anyone know of a way to find out if my particular jeep came with a top or actually DOORS from the factory!
    I have owned jeeps for quite a while and today I was told from a County Sheriff that my jeep had to have doors on it.
    I told him my jeep probably did not come from the factory with a top and doors. He said "well it has hinges on it" and I explaned that these were aftermarket Bestop hinges. He said " if it has hinges for doors then we will figure it came with doors unless you can prove it!"
    He wasn't a butt head about it and never saw I had no mirrors!
    Our conversation was actually pleasant and we both learned a lot.
    So back to my question. How do I know if my jeep came with a top?
     
  2. Jun 18, 2010
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    The soft top was supplied as a dealer installed item. Usually the Jeep was delivered open and the customer had the dealer install the type of top they wanted. However, they were completely street legal without a top and doors and could be licensed with no top. You could get the Jeep with a hard top installed from the factory, but most dealers did not.

    Your Sheriff is wrong.

    I suggest you get a copy of the sales brochure for your year. It will show a picture of Jeeps with no top.
     
  3. Jun 18, 2010
    djljeep

    djljeep Meandering Aimlessly

    Western Maine
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    199
    I don't know about finding what came with doors and what didn't. but if i were trying to get out of a ticket i would ask to see the specific line in the book explicitly stating what he is trying to enforce. Up here as far as i know as long as you have side view mirrors your good. the top should be a non-issue, it's a convertible. they don't pull over convertible mustangs and corvettes do they? worst come to worse run half doors.
     
  4. Jun 18, 2010
    jpflat2a

    jpflat2a what's that noise?

    Hermosa, SD
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    8,520
    yep..
    where has he been all these years, on the moon ?

    buy him a donut and he'll probably go away...
     
  5. Jun 18, 2010
    Daryl

    Daryl Sponsor

    Bonney Lake, WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    Ask him for the actual RCW that says you need doors. Probably has it confused with the Yjs that for years several LEOs said that you couldn't take off the doors because the stock mirror mounts were on them.
     
  6. Jun 18, 2010
    ExpressEN1

    ExpressEN1 Member

    Central Arkansas
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    98
    As a former LEO, if I thought I was in the right, These two would have earned a ticket. Police do not carry the law books around with them. If I was in the wrong, then hopefully the judge would correct it and the ticket would be dismissed and "hopefully" the officer would be that much wiser.

    In this case, He is most likely mistaken and the sales brochure will show it.

    If you want to see the law in writing then you ask at the station or the court house. Most officers do not like their knowledge of the law to be questioned, at least not when they have just pulled you over. Some even get upset over that. You never know. Your state may have a law about doors. There are so many strange and obsolete laws in the books that anything is possible.

    Good luck to you and keep jeepin....
     
  7. Jun 18, 2010
    djljeep

    djljeep Meandering Aimlessly

    Western Maine
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2008
    Messages:
    199
    Thats good to know...
     
  8. Jun 18, 2010
    Sparky74cj

    Sparky74cj Member

    Naches, Washington
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    146
    Maybe I wasn't clear enough. Its the doors not the top he is talking about. convertables of all kinds have doors, this does not apply to what I am asking. This is a federal law he is e-mailing me. If the rig had doors installed from the factory then it must have doors. I don't realy think he is wrong, I think he just is uneducated on these vehicles and there specs.
    In my area we have a lot of Yota's and Cherokees being used in offroad applications. these things are stripped and hacked so that is more what they are gunning for.
    Thanks for the replys. I will do some archive research on what my rig rolled out with. And what the law says!
     
  9. Jun 18, 2010
    captain cj

    captain cj Member

    Crystal Beach...
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    331
    I guess its a sign of the times, younger law enforcement not having a clue about older vehicles . If he wrote you a ticket I would contest it, if for nothing else but to educate him.
     
  10. Jun 18, 2010
    Patrick

    Patrick Super Moderator Staff Member

    Los Alamos, NM
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Messages:
    8,360
    I understand this, and have experienced it.
    I don't think they should threaten citations if they don't know the laws pertaining to a given circumstance.
    BTDT
     
  11. Jun 18, 2010
    captain cj

    captain cj Member

    Crystal Beach...
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    331
    I agree :tea:
     
  12. Jun 19, 2010
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,155
    Check out the Four Wheeler magazine road test of a 74 CJ5 that DREDnot posted today. It specifically mentions that their base model road test Jeep came without a top (and no passenger seat!) and they had to go to the Jeep dealer to get one installed.
     
  13. Jun 19, 2010
    Boyink

    Boyink Super Moderator Staff Member

    Tulsa, OK
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6,197
    Seems like the wrong direction for burden of proof.
     
  14. Jun 19, 2010
    ib4classics

    ib4classics Member

    Johnson City,...
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    94
    Sounds to me like the officer was a little "badge Heavy" and not up on obscure traffic laws.
    The most fun is when a young officer stops you in a 50's car and asks about the lack of seat belts.
    If you remember his name I would gather the info about the jeep and mail it directly to him via the office. That will give him the accurate info. for the next time and bring him down a notch.
    John Mizer
    Retired Calif. traffic Motor Sergeant
     
  15. Jun 19, 2010
    sparky

    sparky Sandgroper Staff Member Founder

    Perth, WA
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    Messages:
    9,221
    I have to agree here.

    I've been thinking about this for several minutes now since reading the reply Patrick is replying to.

    It's disturbing and enlightening. It's no wonder people have a dim view of law enforcement officers if this attitude is pervasive. You don't know how to do your job essentially so you're going to waste my time and effort because you're unsure? Wow!

    As a professional I'm asked to give recommendations on things like fungicide applications for a wheat field. If I don't know I don't give an answer there on the spot. Doing so could cause the farmer hundreds or thousands of dollars in lost revenue either by applying the wrong thing, or at the wrong time, or when it wasn't necessary, or by not applying when it was needed, etc. I go back to the office and consult with who/what I need to in order to find the answer.

    Seems to me that in cases like this you should not be issuing a ticket but educating yourself better after the fact so the next time you're sure. I mean, c'mon, it's not like it's a serious infraction (if it even is one). Just let it go the first time and then look it up so you know the next time. Or have a nice conversation with someone about it like the OP experienced. How hard is that? That sure makes for more goodwill than issuing a ticket and saying "use a judge to prove me wrong."
     
  16. Jun 19, 2010
    jinpdx

    jinpdx Member

    Caldwell, ID
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Messages:
    121

    x2, I couldn't have said it better myself. Why should I have to go to court and waste my time because and officer "thinks" he is right.
     
  17. Jun 20, 2010
    cookieman

    cookieman Member

    Colton,Calif
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    302
    :iagree: I had my share of police of enforcement too.
     
  18. Jun 20, 2010
    Daryl

    Daryl Sponsor

    Bonney Lake, WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,880
    In Washington, the law MUST be referenced on the ticket. If the cop doesn't have a copy of the law, how can he possibly write a ticket for it. My dad is a retired State Trooper, so I am not cop bashing. This is simply another case of a cop that makes up the law as he goes and assumes that noone will challenge him on it. I have found that most cops, at least in the West when challenged will go find out the whole truth or will back down. Also why I don't travel to the stupid states where it will end up with a very unpleasent overnight stay in the local poky.
     
  19. Jun 20, 2010
    cookieman

    cookieman Member

    Colton,Calif
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    302
    In kailfornia what happen ....you get a ticket and in the mail you get fine that you can pay, but if you don't want pay. 1. you take day off work. 2. spend all day at court and tell the judge two words ...not guilty 3. then they give you other day to back and tell your story to jury 4.if you lose you pay court cost and for the jury . So now you lose 2 day of work and maybe a third day. And plus the judge will be on the cop side because he doesn't lie like you!! That how works in the real world!!
     
  20. Jun 21, 2010
    joe28

    joe28 Member

    North Eastern Pa.
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    170
    As an inspection mechanic, I can tell you (at least in Pa.) it's not against the law to ride @ with out doors.
    Tops, hard -er- soft were a option, therfore not part of the OEM of a jeep til what?? mid 70's
    But When someone comes into my shop wide open (as it were), I ADVISE them to,
    1) Always wear seat belts, (It's ill-eagle in Pa. NOT to), (if your jeep didn't come with on from the factory back in the day, add a set).
    2) get a strap to go across the door opening.
    I saw a newer jeep with a metal bar(s) frame 1/2 door that was cool.
    But worse case, get a tie down strap and bolt it to one side and a "D" ring on the other to keep you in.
    Cops like normal people, don't know everything (not like us "Jeep Owners"):D
    If you bust his ***, you win the battle, but lose the war, if'n you get my drift!
    Joe
    Just an old guys 2 cents:)
     
New Posts